I have read that article. I do not quite understand the criteria chosen. It
seems he does not consider speed and he does not consider stability
problems
that may arise from the reference counting either.
Clearly Python is a much less sophistacated language that Python and this
has many advanteges. So Python must win if the strong sides of Lisp are not
appreciated.
Janos Blazi
>
> Marco Antoniotti <·······@parades.rm.cnr.it> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
> ··············@parades.rm.cnr.it...
> >
> > This preamble is for Erik Naggum! DO NOT, I REPEAT, DO NOT READ THE
> > FOLLOWING LINK!
> >
> > Everybody else, read at your own risk. :)
> >
> > http://www.strout.net/python/pythonvslisp.html
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > --
> > Marco Antoniotti ===========================================
> > PARADES, Via San Pantaleo 66, I-00186 Rome, ITALY
> > tel. +39 - 06 68 10 03 17, fax. +39 - 06 68 80 79 26
> > http://www.parades.rm.cnr.it/~marcoxa
>
>
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----