what is the comparison between lisp and other imperative language like
C and Pascal? This comparison should concern to their features not the
syntax.
--
Posted via Talkway - http://www.talkway.com
Exchange ideas on practically anything (tm).
jeiman wrote:
> what is the comparison between lisp and other imperative language like
> C and Pascal? This comparison should concern to their features not the
> syntax.
Look at the C++ vs. Lisp thread above for most of the answer to your
question.
--
-> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- < Rahul -=- Jain > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- <-
-> "I never could get the hang of Thursdays." -Douglas N. Adams <-
-> -=-=-=- URL: http://hoohoo.brrsd.k12.nj.us/~rjain/ -=-=-=- <-
-> -=-=-=-=-=- E-mail: ·················@usa.net -=-=-=-=-=- <-
Version 9.105.999.1111111111111.23.042
(c)1996-1998, All rights reserved.
Disclaimer available upon request.
"jeiman" <······@hotmail.com> writes:
> what is the comparison between lisp and other imperative language like
> C and Pascal? This comparison should concern to their features not the
> syntax.
C features:
- geeky look
- Memory leaks
- unportabilities
- unreported integer overflows
- locust swarms
Pascal features:
- type profusion
Lisp features:
- less fat
- more filling
- world peace
- RPLACD
Stig Hemmer,
Jack of a Few Trades.
William Deakin wrote:
> Matt Curtin wrote:
>
> > Don't forget "tastes great".
>
> Is that on or with toast?
>
I think you're confusing lisp with nutella. I understand,
I frequently make that mistake myself!
dave