From: Klaus Schilling
Subject: Re: Small embeddable Lisp or Scheme interpreter?
Date: 
Message-ID: <87678g5p9p.fsf@home.ivm.de>
·······@home.com (Preston L. Bannister) writes:
>         
> Guile   (derived from SCM)
>         + intended as embeddable
>         - no Win32 port (OS/390 unknown)
> 

Guile builds on NT with cygwin32 tools installed.
In any case it is not that small.

> There are (of course) quite a few Lisp and Scheme implementations.  
> Most have seen narrow use and/or can be built on few platforms.
> 
> So are the above the only practical alternatives, or are there others?
> 
elk 
kawa (runs on a java vm) 
--
Klaus Schilling
From: Bengt Kleberg
Subject: Re: Small embeddable Lisp or Scheme interpreter?
Date: 
Message-ID: <bengt-0503992152100001@dialup164-1-17.swipnet.se>
In article <··············@home.ivm.de>, Klaus Schilling
<···············@home.ivm.de> wrote:

> ·······@home.com (Preston L. Bannister) writes:
...deleted
> > So are the above the only practical alternatives, or are there others?
> > 
> elk 
> kawa (runs on a java vm) 

Is there something smaller than siod?
From: Keith Wright
Subject: Re: Small embeddable Lisp or Scheme interpreter?
Date: 
Message-ID: <yklnhbdtaz.fsf@kwright.tiac.net>
·····@softwell.se (Bengt Kleberg) writes:

> Is there something smaller than siod?

Scheme In Zero Defuns?  I doubt it.
-- 
     --Keith

This mail message sent by GNU emacs and Linux.
Food, Shelter, Source code.
From: Yiorgos Adamopoulos
Subject: Re: Small embeddable Lisp or Scheme interpreter?
Date: 
Message-ID: <slrn7efrda.8r.george@hawk.dbnet.ece.ntua.gr>
In article <······················@dialup164-1-17.swipnet.se>, Bengt Kleberg
wrote:
>In article <··············@home.ivm.de>, Klaus Schilling
>Is there something smaller than siod?

TinyScheme http://www.altera.gr/dsouflis


-- 
if you don't own the master, the master owns you
comp.lang.lisp / 1999 / mar