From: Robert Miller
Subject: help! (run-line encoding)
Date: 
Message-ID: <335d9e3e.15092190@nntp.lse.fullfeed.com>
Can anyone help me create a function(s) to run-line encode binary
lists?  (common lisp)

i.e.

>(compress '(1110100001))
((3 1) 0 1 (4 0) 1)

From: Erik Naggum
Subject: Re: help! (run-line encoding)
Date: 
Message-ID: <3102578704536265@naggum.no>
* Robert Miller
| Can anyone help me create a function(s) to run-line encode binary
| lists?  (common lisp)

  A student comes to a young professor's office hours.  She glances down
  the hall, closes his door, kneels pleadingly.

  "I would do anything to pass this exam."

  She leans closer to him, flips back her hair, gazes meaningfully into his
  eyes.

  "I mean..." she whispers, "...I would do...anything!!!"

  He returns her gaze.  "Anything???"

  "Yes,... Anything!!!"

  His voice turns to a whisper.  "Would you ... study???" 

#:Erik
-- 
  Abort, Retry, or Upgrade?
From: Dick Margulis
Subject: Re: help! (run-line encoding)
Date: 
Message-ID: <6hv6re$egm@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>
This has been an amusing thread, to be sure (speaking as a lurker in
this ng, not much of a participant). But has anyone else noticed that
Mr. Miller's class notes did not even provide him with an accurate
subject line? It's Run Length Encoding, not run-line encoding, Robert.


Erik Naggum wrote:
> 
> * Robert Miller
> | Can anyone help me create a function(s) to run-line encode binary
> | lists?  (common lisp)
> 
>   A student comes to a young professor's office hours.  She glances down
>   the hall, closes his door, kneels pleadingly.
> 
>   "I would do anything to pass this exam."
> 
>   She leans closer to him, flips back her hair, gazes meaningfully into his
>   eyes.
> 
>   "I mean..." she whispers, "...I would do...anything!!!"
> 
>   He returns her gaze.  "Anything???"
> 
>   "Yes,... Anything!!!"
> 
>   His voice turns to a whisper.  "Would you ... study???"
> 
> #:Erik
> --
>   Abort, Retry, or Upgrade?
From: Phil Hunt
Subject: Re: help! (run-line encoding)
Date: 
Message-ID: <893602738snz@vision25.demon.co.uk>
In article <················@naggum.no> ······@naggum.no "Erik Naggum" writes:
> * Robert Miller
> | Can anyone help me create a function(s) to run-line encode binary
> | lists?  (common lisp)
> 
>   A student comes to a young professor's office hours.  She glances down
>   the hall, closes his door, kneels pleadingly.
> 
>   "I would do anything to pass this exam."
> 
>   She leans closer to him, flips back her hair, gazes meaningfully into his
>   eyes.
> 
>   "I mean..." she whispers, "...I would do...anything!!!"
> 
>   He returns her gaze.  "Anything???"
> 
>   "Yes,... Anything!!!"
> 
>   His voice turns to a whisper.  "Would you ... study???" 

ROFL

-- 
* * Phil Hunt * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*   Eurolang, la lang qui tu pos lernar in week-fini. Vidu:   *
*   Eurolang, the language you can learn in a weekend. See:   *
*       <http://www.vision25.demon.co.uk/eurolang.htm>        *
* * * * * * * * * Comuna dua lang per la EU * * * * * * * * * *
From: Martin Rodgers
Subject: Re: help! (run-line encoding)
Date: 
Message-ID: <MPG.fae956dafdd0c939899e9@news.demon.co.uk>
Erik Naggum wheezed these wise words:

>   His voice turns to a whisper.  "Would you ... study???" 

This is scene from "The Eiger Sanction", starring Clint Eastwood. 
A blatant attempt to rip off someone else's work. l)

Nice one. [grin]
-- 
Please note: my email address is munged; You can never browse enough
                  "Oh knackers!" - Mark Radcliffe
From: Erik Naggum
Subject: Re: help! (run-line encoding)
Date: 
Message-ID: <3102677687125053@naggum.no>
* Martin Rodgers
| This is scene from "The Eiger Sanction", starring Clint Eastwood. 

  thanks for the source reference.  it has been circulating as an
  unattributed joke for a while.

| A blatant attempt to rip off someone else's work. l)

  I did not in any way indicate that it was mine, so you're stretching your
  putrid asshole a bit far here.  go hide under your usual rock, again, OK?

#:Erik
-- 
  Abort, Retry, or Upgrade?
From: Martin Rodgers
Subject: Re: help! (run-line encoding)
Date: 
Message-ID: <MPG.faf962eeafab87b9899eb@news.demon.co.uk>
Erik Naggum wheezed these wise words:

>   I did not in any way indicate that it was mine, so you're stretching your
>   putrid asshole a bit far here.  go hide under your usual rock, again, OK?

Kindly note the smiley before flaming.

Where's your sense of humour? Lost in the redmist?
-- 
Please note: my email address is munged; You can never browse enough
                  "Oh knackers!" - Mark Radcliffe
From: Erik Naggum
Subject: Re: help! (run-line encoding)
Date: 
Message-ID: <3102745361611735@naggum.no>
* Martin Rodgers
| Kindly note the smiley before flaming.

  fuck you.  :)

#:Erik
-- 
  Abort, Retry, or Upgrade?
From: Martin Rodgers
Subject: Re: help! (run-line encoding)
Date: 
Message-ID: <MPG.fafbead863dad119899ee@news.demon.co.uk>
Erik Naggum wheezed these wise words:

> * Martin Rodgers
> | Kindly note the smiley before flaming.
> 
>   fuck you.  :)

Now that's more like it. :-)
-- 
Please note: my email address is munged; You can never browse enough
                  "Oh knackers!" - Mark Radcliffe
From: Stig Hemmer
Subject: Re: help! (run-line encoding)
Date: 
Message-ID: <ekvyawsfd4p.fsf@gnoll.pvv.ntnu.no>
······@usc.edu (Robert Miller) writes:
> Can anyone help me create a function(s) to run-line encode binary
> lists?  (common lisp)

What is your problem with the answers given to this question the last
time you asked it?

Stig Hemmer.