From: Mike McDonald
Subject: Re: Why lisp failed in the marketplace
Date: 
Message-ID: <5fi086$8cr@fido.asd.sgi.com>
In article <····················@hamlet.zeus.gmd.de>,
	·······@zeus.gmd.de (Holger Schauer) writes:
>>>"HB" == Henry Baker schrieb am Thu, 20 Feb 1997 18:46:22 GMT:
> 
>  HB> Excellent point!  Such a class usually uses a really bad (slow)
>  HB> implementation of Lisp, and no decent parenthesis matching
>  HB> editor.  Lisp has come a long way from 1965, which is the kind of
>  HB> Lisp those courses teach.
> 
> This is probably the more important point. When I first saw Lisp it was
> Xlisp on an MS-DOS system with an editor which had no support for Lisp
> in any way. The environment was really bad - I hated the lots of
> parentheses and had troubles seeing any structure in lisp code.

  My first introduction to lisp was on an IBM 360-XXX in batch mode! I couldn't
figure out why anyone would want to use lisp as a result. Later, when we got a
Vax 11/780 running BSD, I got hooked on Franz Lisp. An interactive environment
for lisp makes a big difference.

  Mike McDonald
  ·······@engr.sgi.com

From: Henry Baker
Subject: Re: Why lisp failed in the marketplace
Date: 
Message-ID: <hbaker-0403972322300001@10.0.2.1>
In article <··········@fido.asd.sgi.com>, ·······@engr.sgi.com (Mike
McDonald) wrote:
> >>>"HB" == Henry Baker schrieb am Thu, 20 Feb 1997 18:46:22 GMT:
> > 
> >  HB> Excellent point!  Such a class usually uses a really bad (slow)
> >  HB> implementation of Lisp, and no decent parenthesis matching
> >  HB> editor.  Lisp has come a long way from 1965, which is the kind of
> >  HB> Lisp those courses teach.
>   My first introduction to lisp was on an IBM 360-XXX in batch mode! I
couldn't
> figure out why anyone would want to use lisp as a result. Later, when we got a
> Vax 11/780 running BSD, I got hooked on Franz Lisp. An interactive environment
> for lisp makes a big difference.
> 
>   Mike McDonald
>   ·······@engr.sgi.com

I'm no fan of batch processing, but _even in batch processing mode_, Lisp
was still more productive than other batch processing languages I've used
(Fortran, PL/I, assembly, Pascal, etc.).

(Yes, Virginia, there was life before emacs, just like there was life
before indoor plumbing. :-)
From: Arun Welch
Subject: Re: Why lisp failed in the marketplace
Date: 
Message-ID: <331DDB2E.3688B669@csi.compuserve.com>
Henry Baker wrote:
> 
> (Yes, Virginia, there was life before emacs, just like there was life
> before indoor plumbing. :-)

And conversely, I can remember bringing up NIL on a VAX just so I'd have
emacs :-).

...arun
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arun Welch                                      5000 Britton Rd
Lead Engineer, Internet R&D                     Hilliard, OH 43026
CompuServe Network Services                     ······@compuserve.net