In article <··············@sarastro.lanl.gov> Mark Galassi <·······@sarastro.lanl.gov> writes:
·······@zeus.gmd.de (Holger Schauer) writes:
> [foreign function interfaces for lisp]
> So, would you say that it is not possible to define such a standard
> interface because it would require uniform implementation details ?
> [...]
> I think from the user's point of view a standarized foreign-function
> interface would be great.
There is a good chance that Guile's high level C API (the gh_
interface) will be adopted by most of the Scheme implementors. I have
designed with that in mind.
Huh? Being one of those Scheme implementors myself, and not having
even heard about this API until just now, I find this statement a bit
preposterous.
--
-Matthias