From: Mark Galassi
Subject: Re: Foreign Functions (was Re: Why lisp failed in the marketplace)
Date:
Message-ID: <76vi7fkpv4.fsf@sarastro.lanl.gov>
·······@zeus.gmd.de (Holger Schauer) writes:
> [foreign function interfaces for lisp]
> So, would you say that it is not possible to define such a standard
> interface because it would require uniform implementation details ?
> [...]
> I think from the user's point of view a standarized foreign-function
> interface would be great.
There is a good chance that Guile's high level C API (the gh_
interface) will be adopted by most of the Scheme implementors. I have
designed with that in mind.
--
{These opinions are mine, and should be everybody else's :-)}
Mark Galassi ·······@nis.lanl.gov or ········@lanl.gov
URL: http://nis-www.lanl.gov/~rosalia/