From: Bob Riemenschneider
Subject: Re: In- and Out-of- core editors (was Re: Which one, Lisp or Scheme?)
Date:
Message-ID: <tpn2szgg6s.fsf@violet.csl.sri.com>
In article <···············@staffa.aiai.ed.ac.uk> Tim Bradshaw
<···@aiai.ed.ac.uk> writes:
> I wish you did end interlisp sessions that way. I usually ended them
> in whatever the remote debugger was, trying to rescue days of work by
> grovelling through the VM of the dead Lisp after it fell over because
> I made some tiny error. ...
I must confess that my fond recollections of Interlisp are based mostly on
Interlisp-10. That implementation was pretty solid. But maybe my
memory's just getting dim, because that *&····@$ Foonly couldn't have been
more reliable than D-machines.
-- rar