In article <·················@best.best.com> ···@best.com (.) writes:
Thomas> The CAML system actually looks pretty good, but it also has a
Thomas> special-purpose VM, its VM is also legally encumbered, its security
Thomas> story is not as good as Java's (we are talking relative quality
Thomas> here), and it has no widespread acceptance.
Can you elaborate on the ``security story'' of the caml VM (or provide
pointers to further information)?
--
Thorsten Ohl, Physics Department, TH Darmstadt --- PGP: AF 38 FF CE 03 8A 2E A7
http://crunch.ikp.physik.th-darmstadt.de/~ohl/ -------- 8F 2A C1 86 8C 06 32 6B