Is there anyone who uses the ilisp package with xemacs 19.14?
I have it but it doesn't seem to work correctly. But I'm not sure what
correctly should look like. The manual doesn't really tell either.
I am under the impression that it should like like lisp-interaction-mode,
but I am not sure.
Any help would be appreciated
--
-Joe Novosel (········@cc.gatech.edu)
>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Novosel <········@cc.gatech.edu> writes:
Joe> Is there anyone who uses the ilisp package with xemacs 19.14? I
Joe> have it but it doesn't seem to work correctly. But I'm not sure
Joe> what correctly should look like. The manual doesn't really tell
Joe> either. I am under the impression that it should like like
Joe> lisp-interaction-mode, but I am not sure.
What doesn't work about it? ilisp is Inferior Lisp mode, and runs a
Lisp interpreter in an XEmacs buffer, and appears to work for me with
GNU Common Lisp.
--
·····@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be proofread for $250/hour.
Andrea Seastrand: For your vote on the Telecom bill, I will vote for anyone
except you in November.
Steven L Baur (·····@miranova.com) wrote:
: >>>>> "Joe" == Joe Novosel <········@cc.gatech.edu> writes:
: Joe> Is there anyone who uses the ilisp package with xemacs 19.14? I
: Joe> have it but it doesn't seem to work correctly. But I'm not sure
: Joe> what correctly should look like. The manual doesn't really tell
: Joe> either. I am under the impression that it should like like
: Joe> lisp-interaction-mode, but I am not sure.
: What doesn't work about it? ilisp is Inferior Lisp mode, and runs a
: Lisp interpreter in an XEmacs buffer, and appears to work for me with
: GNU Common Lisp.
It does that, is that all it's supposed to do?
--
-Joe Novosel (········@cc.gatech.edu)
>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Novosel <········@cc.gatech.edu> writes:
Joe> Is there anyone who uses the ilisp package with xemacs 19.14? I
Joe> have it but it doesn't seem to work correctly. ...
sb> ... ilisp is Inferior Lisp mode, and runs a Lisp interpreter in an
sb> XEmacs buffer ...
Joe> It does that, is that all it's supposed to do?
Yup. Use lisp-mode for editing lisp source files, if that's what you
were thinking of.
--
·····@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be proofread for $250/hour.
Andrea Seastrand: For your vote on the Telecom bill, I will vote for anyone
except you in November.
On 25 Aug 1996 21:28:32 -0700, Steven L Baur <·····@miranova.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Novosel <········@cc.gatech.edu> writes:
>Joe> Is there anyone who uses the ilisp package with xemacs 19.14? I
>Joe> have it but it doesn't seem to work correctly. ...
>sb> ... ilisp is Inferior Lisp mode, and runs a Lisp interpreter in an
>sb> XEmacs buffer ...
>
>Joe> It does that, is that all it's supposed to do?
Another person who wants EMACS to be a Lisp Machine...
Franz Allegro running on Unix has a nice interface to EMACS, the FI
package. Most of our former Symbolics hacks have adapted to it nicely.
It even has META-dot.
--
Daniel Poirot ·············@jsc.nasa.gov
Metrica/NASA-JSC http://tommy.jsc.nasa.gov/~poirot
Mail Code: ER6 tel: (713)483-8793
Houston, TX 77058 fax: (713)483-3204
In article <··············@deanna.miranova.com> Steven L Baur <·····@miranova.com> writes:
\\ >>>>> "Joe" == Joe Novosel <········@cc.gatech.edu> writes:
\\
\\
\\ Joe> Is there anyone who uses the ilisp package with xemacs 19.14? I
\\ Joe> have it but it doesn't seem to work correctly. ...
\\
\\ sb> ... ilisp is Inferior Lisp mode, and runs a Lisp interpreter in an
\\ sb> XEmacs buffer ...
\\
\\ Joe> It does that, is that all it's supposed to do?
\\
\\ Yup. Use lisp-mode for editing lisp source files, if that's what you
\\ were thinking of.
Not quite, ilisp does provide a rather extensive interface to the
underlying lisp process. It also adds in a much nicer indenting facility
than the default lisp-mode one. The only complaint I have is that the keys
for tags-* operations are remapped.
Sunil