Much to my amazement, I found a bug in CLtL2. Is there an errata
sheet available for it?
The problem is in the examples of the package stuff. The new text
on pages 283--286 calls
(in-package 'foo)
but the new description of in-package on pp 263--264 states that
the "name" parameter is not evaluated, so the above call looks for
the package called (quote foo). The correct new invocation of
in-package should be
(in-package foo)
or
(in-package "FOO")
- David