Does it exist? Any lisp that compiles on NS/FIP?
Sorry if this has been answered before -- I checked a bunch of FAQs and some
www sites, found no Handy Pointers.
Brad Garton
music dept.
······@columbia.edu
The file:
ftp.zkm.de:/pub/gcl-NeXT386.tar.gz
has mods to get GCL 1.1 working on NeXTStep/Intel. An enclosed readme
explains how to do it.
Rick Taube
···@zkm.de
Zentrum fuer Kunst u. Medientechnologie
Karlsruhe, Germany
Rick Taube (···@ccrma.stanford.edu) wrote:
: The file:
: ftp.zkm.de:/pub/gcl-NeXT386.tar.gz
: has mods to get GCL 1.1 working on NeXTStep/Intel. An enclosed readme
: explains how to do it.
What about Black HW? Will slight mods to the mods make it work for my
NeXTSTation also? I can't get the stock distribution to work at all. It
just barfs with a segmentation fault while runnning "raw_gcl" during the
compile. Pointers anyone?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ Kurt D. Bollacker University of Texas at Austin +
+ ···@pine.ece.utexas.edu P.O. Box 8566, Austin, TX 78713 +
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
In article <··········@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> ···@pegasus.ece.utexas.edu (Kurt
D. Bollacker) writes:
>What about Black HW? Will slight mods to the mods make it work for my
>NeXTSTation also? I can't get the stock distribution to work at all. It
>just barfs with a segmentation fault while runnning "raw_gcl" during the
>compile. Pointers anyone?
>
I was able to make GCL compile cleanly on my 'slab by using GNU make
and a "straight" gcc-2.6.3. I can make a binary distribution available
for those who do not want to compile gmake and gcc-2.6.3 before making
gcl.
Erik