In article <············@sytex.com> ····@sytex.com (Scott McLoughlin) writes:
>····@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton) writes:
>
>> > Good point. Are there any 100% portable CL sources
>> >available that implement a Lisp reader and that are PD.
>>
>> What do you mean by 100% portable? Some of them are in C and
>> are as portable as C usually is.
>
> I meant portable CL code. I don't care if Lisp
>readers are available in portable PL/M, ADA, APL or COBOL.
>Same for C.
But what do you mean by 100% portable? Conforming to the ANSI
standard? Actually runnable w/ no #+ or #- in all Common Lisps?