From: Jeff Dalton
Subject: Re: OOPified readtables: namespaces, dyn. binding, etc [was: Re: ISO/IEC CD 13816 -- ISLisp]
Date: 
Message-ID: <DJ2DFK.BuF@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
···@zurich.ai.mit.edu (Bill Dubuque) writes:

>  From: ······@ilog.fr (Bruno Haible)
>  Date: 28 Nov 1995 21:27:16 GMT

>  Erik Naggum <····@naggum.no> wrote:
>  > - no reader macros

>  How do you solve the collision problems when two modules define, say,
>  #{...} in two different ways? - Features which carry unsolved problems
>  are not ready for standardization.

>Has anyone done work on solving this problem?

What's supposed to be so difficult about it?  In any case, it
has no more serious "unsolved" problems than many of the things
that went into Common Lisp.

-- jd