now that the public review period is over, and considering that they wouldn't
take email notices anyway, what would now the best way to mention that there
are conflicts in the descriptions of atan and atanh?
--
Hume Smith Wenn ich des Tages nicht dreimal
··········@acadiau.ca mein Schaelchen Coffee trinken darf,
······@bnr.ca so werd' ich ju zu meiner Qual
wie ein verdorrtes Ziegenbraetchen.
In article <·····················@bcars148> ······@bnr.ca (hume smith) writes:
>now that the public review period is over, and considering that they wouldn't
>take email notices anyway, what would now the best way to mention that there
>are conflicts in the descriptions of atan and atanh?
There's almost certainly going to be a second public review period, to
review the version of the draft that results from fixing the problems
during the first review. You can raise this issue then. Unfortunately, if
fixing it requires making a technical change to the draft, that would force
a third revision and public review.
X3J13 isn't technically restricted to making changes only as a result of
review comments, although I believe we're trying to limit ourselves to
this. Please send me a description of the problem and I'll see what needs
to be done about it.
What does not taking email comments have to do with it?
--
Barry Margolin
System Manager, Thinking Machines Corp.
······@think.com {uunet,harvard}!think!barmar