From: Stephen E. Bacher
Subject: Re: Lisp better than C?
Date: 
Message-ID: <RNETMAIL9112271023463SEB1525@MVS.DRAPER.COM>
Craig Harpel <······@mitre.org> writes:

>...back to the dark ages of FORTRAN and COBOL and now C because they
>are "established", even though they are pathetic languages when it
>comes to productivity and, especially in the case of C, unreadable.
>...  Hence the new generation of hackers as opposed to computer
>scientists.  It is reasoning ... (or lack thereof) that is prevalent
>today.  The new hackers can't see the backward evolution in computer
>languages that C is dragging us toward...

I didn't want to join in until I had something specific to say, but I
do want to make known my 100% agreement with and appreciation of your
commentary.  It reflects exactly what I think of the current computing
"state of the art".  IMHO, we are undergoing a Dark Age of
computational technology.  Fortunately, a continuing undercurrent of
use of progressive languages like Lisp and Rexx survives; hopefully it
will last until the rest of the world finally wakes up to the barren
promise of "portability" and "productivity" foisted on us by the
UNIX/C community.  At that moment, there will be a Renaissance led by
the faithful.  Fight on, because we will prevail in the end...

 - Steve Bacher
 - MVS and LISP systems programmer and REXX hacker
 - Draper Laboratory