In article <·····················@linus.mitre.org>, ····@thelonius.mitre.org (John D. Burger) writes:
> How can I terminate the method execution sequence after a before
> method, i.e. without running other before, primary and after
> methods.
>
> The short answer is that you can't do this, except with a non-local
> exit, as in your call to ERROR.
Actually, if you write your own method combination type you can
control this. But if you do this, I would suggest you call the
method type something besides :BEFORE, since people wouldn't expect
this behaviour from a :BEFORE method.