From: ······@uicslsaj.cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: YACC/LEX Equivalents?
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1988 15:16:00 +0000
Message-ID: <4400006@uicslsaj>

Does anyone know of/have cheap (preferably free) equivalents of
Unix's YACC and LEX (i.e., parser generator and lexical analyzer
generator) written in Common LISP?

Bob Reinke
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
······@uicslsai.csl.uiuc.edu

• Re: YACC/LEX Equivalents? David Rich
  • Re: YACC/LEX Equivalents? Albert Boulanger

From: David Rich
Subject: Re: YACC/LEX Equivalents?
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 1988 16:30:01 +0000
Message-ID: <7313@lanl.gov>

In article <·······@uicslsaj>, ······@uicslsaj.cs.uiuc.edu writes:
> 
> Does anyone know of/have cheap (preferably free) equivalents of
> Unix's YACC and LEX (i.e., parser generator and lexical analyzer
> generator) written in Common LISP?
> 

If such beasts exist, I'd be interested as well!

--Dave

From: Albert Boulanger
Subject: Re: YACC/LEX Equivalents?
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 1988 20:06:59 +0000
Message-ID: <33664@bbn.COM>

While not equivalent to YACC/LEX combination, CGOL is public domain,
as far as I know. This was written a while ago by Pratt and updated
for Common Lisp by George Carrette. I believe it can be gotten from
MIT (in the lmlib directory on various machines there).

Albert Boulanger
BBN Systems & Technologies Corp.
··········@bbn.com